Scott Simmonds, CPCU, ARM

Helping Experts Build Great Businesses
www.ICMentor.com

May, 2008

Cold Calling - Letter to The Editor

Here's a letter to the editor I wrote to the Northeast insurance magazine The Standard on one of my favorite peeves, cold calling:

Sir,

I'm prompted to write in response to your article, "Sensible Sales Strategies Work, South Shore Agents Learn" (The Standard, April 25, 2008).

Hogwash!

The strategies espoused by Mr. Nanigan may have worked in the last century, but they are ineffective in 2008. Interruption marketing techniques like cold calling are the last resort of desperate, unsuccessful salespeople. Nobody wakes up in the morning hoping they will be interrupted in their work by phone spam. No business person, upon realizing that they are talking with a cold-caller, thinks, "It's my lucky day, an insurance salesperson is calling me!" What professional would want to start a relationship with such a negative?

Cold-calling does nothing for you. The occasional successful appointment only teases cold-callers into thinking that they are being productive. In reality, of twenty unsolicited calls you make, nineteen of the people on the other end of the phone think that you must be a loser if this is the only way you can get new business. Stop cold calling.

Even the suspect who does allow you to meet with them thinks poorly of you, as you started the relationship on a negative. Your chances of establishing a profitable long-term relationship are almost zero.

In my twenty years as an agent I made my share (and more) of cold calls. Even ten years ago they were limited in their success. Now, cold calling just irritates potential suspects.

Now to Mr. Nanigan's most outrageous advice: if you can't get through to someone, deceive them with a tricky voice mail message. His suggestion that you leave a short message claiming that the conversation is important is the pinnacle of arrogance. Clearly, the call is important to you. The person you call will be less than thrilled at being hoodwinked by your message. Would you buy from someone who deceived you into calling? Who wants to treated that way?

If you consider yourself to be a professional, you will act as a professional. Market yourself by showing exceptional value to your clients. Referrals from clients can open the doors to their friends who need (and deserve) your help. Write articles for your local newspaper and trade publications. Speak to industry association meetings. Be seen by your market as the go-to person for insurance help. Create a body of knowledge and work that causes great prospects to seek you out. Such marketing gravity puts you in your prospect's mind as a vital, valuable resource. Price now becomes a secondary matter in the insurance transaction.

Mr. Nanigan's suggestions, as made in your article, are misguided at best, unethical at worse. Insurance professionals are better than that.

Regards,
Scott Simmonds, CPCU, ARM, CMC
Insurance Consultant & Coach

Slimy Claim Practices - Letter to The Editor

While I'm sharing letters I wrote, here is one that went last week to the editor of the National Underwriter:

To the Editor:

My letter is prompted by a recent question posted by your FC&S publication.  The issue is illustrative of a problem I often see as a consultant to insurance buyers in claims transactions.

Here are the facts as presented to FC&S by the questioner from Connecticut:

"The neighbor of our insured had new windows installed within the last few years that have low-e glass. The insured recently noticed that a section of the vinyl siding on the rear of his home was buckled. We had an engineer go out for an inspection to determine the cause of the damage to the siding. He determined that the reflection of the sun off the low-e glass had temperatures as high as 180 degrees reflecting on this section of the siding where there is no shade. This ultimately caused the damage. Could we deny this claim based on the wear and tear or inherent vice exclusion? We write the HO3 (4/91) edition."

The questioner is, I assume, a claims person for an insurance company.  He/she is clearly grasping at straws, looking for a way not to pay this claim.  There is no possible way to look at this event and claim as "wear and tear" or "inherent vice."  By no conceivable standard is this not a covered claim under the homeowners' form 3!

Unfortunately, I run into this all the time.  Uninformed or poorly trained claims-people hunting exhaustively for reasons not to pay a claim.  It is unconscionable.   I'm brought in to try and convince the insurer to act properly.  Reasonable people will, quite naturally, disagree over important issues.  That is not what I'm talking about.  All too often the adjuster either is uneducated in insurance or just plain unscrupulous.  In some cases I can only recommend legal action against the insurer.  Can you spell, "bad faith?"
We wonder why our industry has such a poor reputation.  The poster of this scenario should be hunted down and fired by his or her employer for even asking such a question.  God help us all if this is from a claim supervisor.

Here is the response from FC&S: "No, this is not 'wear and tear' or 'inherent vice.' This loss can be directly attributed to an outside agency; i.e., the heat from the windows. The siding didn't wear out over time, which would be excluded. Inherent vice means that there would be a characteristic within the siding that caused it to deteriorate or fail, but the outside force of the windows' heat production was what led to the buckling. No other exclusion applies, so the loss is covered."

Clearly, I agree with the FC&S response.  Bravo.  However, I would have added, "You slimy bastard!"

Regards,
Scott Simmonds, CPCU, ARM, CMC
Insurance Consultant & Coach


Blog Posts in Your Business Made Better

Visit my Business Blog at - www.YourBusinessMade Better.com

Subscribe to my blog to get immediate notification of my postings by email. You can also view my entries by using a service such as Google Reader.

Also, sign up for my "Almost Daily" Insurance Blog at www.InsuranceBuzzer.com.


Consultant Mentor Program - Designed to help you build your business faster, with less hassle, and fewer false starts. Grow your current practice or gain the edge in your startup. The object is for you to make your business the best it can be - faster and more profitably. Visit my informational page at Consultant Mentor Program. Check out my Insurance Consultant's Handbook too.


Insurance Agent Mentor Program - Is your insurance career as successful as it can be? Is your book of business growing as fast as you would like? Is your retention as strong as others in your agency? I'm glad to talk about how we might be able to work together to build your book of business. Visit my informational page at Insurance Agent Mentor Program.


Please Forward This Newsletter To Other Insurance People


Scott Simmonds, CPCU, ARM, CMC
Insurance Consulting
Phone 207-284-0085
Fax 802-992-4027
Scott@ScottSimmonds.com
www.ScottSimmonds.com

Mentoring/Coaching Website: www.ICMentor.com

See My Blog - www.InsuranceBuzzer.com


Comments regarding insurance policies or products in this newsletter do not constitute an endorsement. I accept no fees of any kind from any company mentioned in this newsletter.

© 2008 Insurance Consultants of Maine, Inc. All Rights Reserved. We encourage sharing this newsletter if copyright and attribution (including my web address) are always included.